Mortise and Tenons -

This is a forum for intermediate to advanced woodworkers. Show off your projects or share your ideas.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

dcottrill wrote:Thank you for the excellent discussion. It looks like a split.

The angle is for design, and it maybe off in the diagram as I'm still working on the exact angle (approximately 67 degrees). It is inspired by Scandinavian designs. They tend to have a different bend to children's furniture.

The seat will be stationary and the foot rest will adjust up or down depending on the child's height.

The pinning of Mortise and tenon joint is an excellent idea, one that I've been considering.

I thought that the forces on the joint would tend to cause a downward motion on the leg resulting in a "clock wise" twisting motion at the joint.

Hopefully, the child is under 100 pounds. It maybe prudent to design for an occasional use by Dad or Mom!
Not discussed is whether it would be better to reverse the mortise and tenon on the two pieces. I would still favor the lower version. I would extend the back end of the 'foot' past the back of the leg to provide more material behind the mortise. The back edge of the leg tenon would have the 'hook' detail.
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
michaeltoc
Gold Member
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:51 pm
Location: White Plains, NY

Post by michaeltoc »

JPG40504 wrote:The 'problem' with the angled joint is that the load results in torque being applied.
You are so right! I was just looking at the floor reaction, totally ignoring that a point load is applied at the opposite end of the leg - which results in a torque.
Michael

Mark V Model 500 (1985) upgraded to 520 (2009) and PowerPro (2011); Bandsaw, Jointer, Jigsaw, Planer.
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

This simple wood working project is starting to sound like a grossly over engineered Government project.

Stress, torque whatever; do a good glue joint and it will hold.

Some of you may find this to be interesting reading.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

dusty wrote:This simple wood working project is starting to sound like a grossly over engineered Government project.

Stress, torque whatever]this[/URL] to be interesting reading.
Yes it was! Surprised that the m/t was not much better than the doweled.

Did not say much about angled m/t joints.

Interesting grain orientation observation!

Thanks!
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
dcottrill
Gold Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:06 am
Location: Utica, New York

Post by dcottrill »

Originally Posted by dusty
This simple wood working project is starting to sound like a grossly over engineered Government project.

Stress, torque whatever; do a good glue joint and it will hold.

Some of you may find this to be interesting reading.
Very interesting review. I like the mortise and tenon for this joint. My pieces are 1-1/4" thick, not 3/4". The test run with the 3/4" boards 4" wide seems very idea for the dowel joints. Narrow it down to 3" or 2-1/" and the dowels may not offer the as much strength.

A good glue joint seems to be key in all the joints that were tested.

I'm leaning towards the bottom joint and pinning it.
Post Reply