First let me apologize for the use of the word nonsense. It was unkind and really did not convey what I was trying to express.rjent wrote:I am sorry Ed if you see it as nonsense, but to me it is the truth. Did it for 40 years. Like I said, I could write a book, but I stand by my assessment. Building houses you are in a guild (license) and have an established market (price/foot). To me that is not what we are talking about here. Do you really think a painting is worth a million dollars. Only to the buyer.
Not getting into a debate, but I think berry asked an age old, and very good question, and I am just passing on my experience FWIW
Let's use the million dollar picture scenario, my guess the artist never set the price. That price was set when the completed object was judged to be worth that much by people willing to pay the price. However art has an subjective value that most repair or installations don't have unless we are talking unique design and/or carving.
The question is how do I set price particularly labor. Building houses was a poor example. As a builder I don't know how much time I will spend on a house due a zillion factors.
Pricing comes from experience. I was watching This Old House and Tommy was cutting stairs. He showed a method that he described as accurate and quick. This was a method he used and knew exactly how long it would take to do. He knew it was going to take x hours. He could price the labor using x times what he wanted an hour.
The originator of this topic said he was looking at small and unique jobs others probably wouldn't go after. My suggestion he price these types of jobs as cost plus. He could supply the customer with a fairly accurate material lists. Then explain he is going to do the job for x percent above that cost.