I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Forum for Maintenance and Repair topics. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
reible
Platinum Member
Posts: 11283
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Aurora, IL

Re: I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Post by reible »

Have you mounted the lower saw guard? If things are as far out as you say that will be an interesting point. With the lower saw guard in place the top guard will have to align with the blade for it to work........ if something is wrong it will show up for sure then.

Ed
{Knight of the Shopsmith} [Hero's don't wear capes, they wear dog tags]
dynabase
Gold Member
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 1:06 am
Location: Post Falls, Idaho

Re: I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Post by dynabase »

Lower saw guard is in place.
User avatar
reible
Platinum Member
Posts: 11283
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Aurora, IL

Re: I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Post by reible »

dynabase wrote:Lower saw guard is in place.
And you can get the blade to align with the upper guard?

Ed
{Knight of the Shopsmith} [Hero's don't wear capes, they wear dog tags]
dynabase
Gold Member
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 1:06 am
Location: Post Falls, Idaho

Re: I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Post by dynabase »

The lower guard is in place and aligns with the upper guard. The blade is about 5/8s from the edge of the sled.
Attachments
IMG_0282b (2).jpg
IMG_0282b (2).jpg (241.14 KiB) Viewed 5091 times
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21481
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Re: I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Post by dusty »

I doubt that you have a problem with the sliding cross-cut table.

I wonder about your rubber stop collar. Mine measure 1.438".

With the lower saw guard removed but a with a blade mounted in the arbor and the head stock locked, push the carriage tight against the rubber stop collar. In this position, with the quill fully retracted, the left edge of the saw blade should align with a line drawn across the left surfaces of the main table tubes.

I would pull a piece of string across the table tubes (on the left side) for this check.

Setup as described above, if you remove the table insert you should be able to eye ball the blade as it aligns with the table cutout. It should appear to be very close to centered.

Sketchup drawing to follow.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35457
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Re: I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Post by JPG »

reible wrote:
JPG wrote:He said a rubber sleeve - therefore he has a 505-20.

The arbor lengths vary by about 1/2". We do not know what arbor he is using.
Not true, my 1976 500 had the rubber sleeve, as did the used machines I have from the late 70's and early 80's.

Perhaps some picture of things would help us help you.

Ed
They made 3/8" rubber sleeves????
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
reible
Platinum Member
Posts: 11283
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Aurora, IL

Re: I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Post by reible »

JPG wrote:
reible wrote:
JPG wrote:He said a rubber sleeve - therefore he has a 505-20.

The arbor lengths vary by about 1/2". We do not know what arbor he is using.
Not true, my 1976 500 had the rubber sleeve, as did the used machines I have from the late 70's and early 80's.

Perhaps some picture of things would help us help you.

Ed
They made 3/8" rubber sleeves????
Here is the one I took off my 1976 500 when I upgraded to the 520.
20170429_184424_resized.jpg
20170429_184424_resized.jpg (168.77 KiB) Viewed 5077 times
Ed
{Knight of the Shopsmith} [Hero's don't wear capes, they wear dog tags]
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35457
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Re: I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Post by JPG »

reible wrote:
JPG wrote:
reible wrote:
Not true, my 1976 500 had the rubber sleeve, as did the used machines I have from the late 70's and early 80's.

Perhaps some picture of things would help us help you.

Ed
They made 3/8" rubber sleeves????
Here is the one I took off my 1976 500 when I upgraded to the 520.

20170429_184424_resized.jpg

Ed
Learned my 'new thing' fer today! Thanks! :)
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
JohnHoeger
Silver Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:15 am

Re: I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Post by JohnHoeger »

I feel the saw blade properly belongs to the left of center of the table insert. That allows a little room for extending the quill slightly to make fine adjustments in the location of the saw blade.
~John H in San Bernardino
dynabase
Gold Member
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 1:06 am
Location: Post Falls, Idaho

Re: I think my main table needs to be alligned.

Post by dynabase »

I don't want to waste anyone's time on this. Bottom line is my system works OK. The sled works and the blade doesn't rub so I'm good for now. After I finish my current project I will do a full alignment and PM on my 520. If I have any alignment issues it should come out then.

Thanks everyone.

Michael
Post Reply