Mark 5 / V part number size descriptions and cross reference

Forum for Maintenance and Repair topics. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

mickyd wrote:Although all the ref. # and some of the part numbers differ from the Mark V manual, the actual descriptions and sizes are "similar" EXCEPT, item 9, 504153 which shows a 1/2"-18 thread. Standard 1/2" thread pitches are 1/2"-13 for course and 1/2"-20 for fine. That set screw one would require a physical check before assuming it's an 18 thread per inch version. I assumed it was -13 course for my database.
I'll check the real world, Mike but at this point I suspect you are correct. The thread count is something that I added into the database, apparently, because I do not find it anywhere in Shopsmith documentation.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

dusty wrote:I'll check the real world, Mike but at this point I suspect you are correct. The thread count is something that I added into the database, apparently, because I do not find it anywhere in Shopsmith documentation.

Yes screw descriptions are quite vague in later parts lists. As for the item 'numbers', I recall attempting a conversation with ss cs and I was referencing the parts by the number in the online drawings. Their item numbers were different!:confused:
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
Post Reply