Page 4 of 5

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:22 am
by kd6vpe
Great work there Dusty thank you. I had bought a shaper fence third party but it did not come with the featherboard. Linda a shopsmith looked up all of the parts and built one from part for me to order since they don't really sell the quill mounted featherboard as a single unit. So you can get one. I have yet to use my shaper but now that I see what you have found I know better when I go to do end grain cuts the featherboard will not work for that type of cut and I won't be so upset thank you for your time and investigative abilities.

Be Very Carefull!

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:39 am
by tryinhard
dusty wrote:I've been thinking about this situation and have decided that I do not know how to set up the shapers (because I have not done that since I had my accident). So, I went to the shop first thing this morning to do a more realistic setup.

After installing the cutters, adjusting the table so that the cutters sit safely in the insert and adjusting the fence for proper depth of cut (I setup for maximum cut depth), I have decided that the "quill mounted featherboard" CANNOT be used in conjunction with the miter fence for reasons already shown.

The following is a possible approach to resolve the original problem.

[ATTACH]7035[/ATTACH]

The tablle and the fence can be moved a little to fine tune these setups but care must be taken so that the cutters and the insert do not simultaneously attempt to occupy the same space.

Dusty--

:eek: I tried this method but used the safety grip hold down as well. It was DISASTER! Even though I was holding the safety grip for dear life, the workpiece JUMPED FORWARD (yes, forward) and I turned white. After I shut everything down, the workpiece had a huge gouge where it had dug into the cutter. I don't think I will try this again.

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:44 am
by ldh
FWIW the shaper is not a tool to fool around with. Steady feed and a lite cut are required for good results. I use a Delta shaper with the spindle below the table that has a reversing motor. Perhaps the new SS with the reversing motor will be a bit better, but one still has the spindle over the table. I just don't feel the SS as a shaper is one of it's strong points. With that said, some very nice work has come from members using the SS as a shaper.
ldh

Shaper Setup Problem?

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:05 pm
by dusty
Mike, anytime a piece of wood decides to go its own direction there is good reason to be concerned.

But, can you be a bit more specific in describing exactly what you were doing. Were you trying to use the rod to prevent the work piece from creeping away from the cutter? Were there any feather boards involved?

A picture would be real neat.

Shaper Setup Problem?

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:43 pm
by dusty
Thank you, z-man. Thank you, tryinhard.

You two, et al, have brought me back a Christmas gift that I have had for many, many years. I now have a new tool to use in my shop. I now have a shaper.

I have not tooled up the shaper in over a dozen years due to an accident that I had while using the shaper. I nearly lost a finger (with damage to a second) due to this past incident. To this day, I am unable to tell anyone exactly what happened - I don't know. I don't believe the cutter got me but I don't see how a "kickout" could have done it either.

Today, in order to better understand this thread, I tooled that puppy up and made a few "shaper chips".

[ATTACH]7036[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]7037[/ATTACH]

The results are nothing to brag on except that they exist. Now that I have come this far - I will make more shaper chips and I will learn why this cut has so many cutter marks.

NO, I did not have the dust collector connected.

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:18 pm
by JPG
tryinhard wrote:Dusty--

:eek: I tried this method but used the safety grip hold down as well. It was DISASTER! Even though I was holding the safety grip for dear life, the workpiece JUMPED FORWARD (yes, forward) and I turned white. After I shut everything down, the workpiece had a huge gouge where it had dug into the cutter. I don't think I will try this again.
Which end went 'forward? The end opposite the cutter? If gouging occured, too agressive a feed/cut is indicated.

BTW Those folks who are wary of Shapers, stay clear of Molders!

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:26 pm
by dusty
JPG40504 wrote:Which end went 'forward? The end opposite the cutter? If gouging occured, too agressive a feed/cut is indicated.

BTW Those folks who are wary of Shapers, stay clear of Molders!


OKAY. I hear your warning - Loud and Clear - but would you care to explain why you feel this why?

Yes, the cutters move at a higher speed but what else?

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:20 pm
by JPG
dusty wrote:OKAY. I hear your warning - Loud and Clear - but would you care to explain why you feel this why?

Yes, the cutters move at a higher speed but what else?

The ability to 'gouge' is also increased with the increase in radius. Also their angled flat sides with greater depth also increases the severity of the gouge(grab).

Although I like their effectiveness, I greatly respect their ability to create disastrous conditions(both for the workpiece and the operator).

My point was that they are more likely to result in a more hazardous result if too aggressive a cut is attempted.

BTW Your shaped workpiece has me puzzled also. What surface/shape are we looking at?

Shaper Setup Problem?

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:34 pm
by dusty
I don't know what I have mounted without going out to look but what has you confused (I believe) is that I have taken a very shallow cut. Only the very tips are touching the work piece.

I have NOT been using my shaper. I have avoided using it for many years. Doing this shallow cut, along with this thread, marks my coming out.

I think.

One thing that happened, during this test cut, was a movement of the quill. I need to check that out before I do anything more. The quill does not seem to be adequately secured even if I crank down on the quill lock.

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:20 pm
by JPG
dusty wrote:I don't know what I have mounted without going out to look but what has you confused (I believe) is that I have taken a very shallow cut. Only the very tips are touching the work piece.

I have NOT been using my shaper. I have avoided using it for many years. Doing this shallow cut, along with this thread, marks my coming out.

I think.

One thing that happened, during this test cut, was a movement of the quill. I need to check that out before I do anything more. The quill does not seem to be adequately secured even if I crank down on the quill lock.

It is those diagonal ridges that have me confused. If they are not part of the shaper formed surface, they are irrelevant.