Modern Casters have Main Load Bearings - that is a row of steel balls or rollers that swivels the fork base in relation to the mounting plate of a swivel caster, and counteracts direct thrust.
Shopsmith did not have Main Load Bearings until the more recent 3" Caster Upgrade.
Manufacturers seem to vary a bit on stems, for example Colson 1 SERIES GRIP RING STEM has a 7/16″ diameter by 1-29/32″ long, with grip ring while their L Series LGR Casters, Grip Ring, Capacity to 150 lbs. has a 7/16" dia. stem x 1 3/8" long.
I have not found one manufacturer or vendor who states it is ok for the Grip Ring Stem to bottom out in the mount hole and protrude from the mounting hole. I have found numerous statements to prevent that from happening.
In 1876, David A. Fisher invented casters for furniture, so Casters actually pre-dated the 1947 Shopsmith by some 71 years.
In 1900, (photo attached) Standard Bearing and Caster and Wheel Company of New York in publication "The Iron Age", dated August 16, 1900 listed their Standard Ball Bearing Caster, again 47 years before the first Shopsmith was made. It already had main load bearings (ball bearings on their king pin style caster).
Shopsmith did not introduce a ball bearing load plate caster in their equipment until the more recent 3" Caster Upgrade.
In the 10E/10ER Caster photo, you can see the caster goes all the way in. In 1947 it did not protrude.
Two of my original Greenies with Steel Wheel casters (now upgraded) did not protrude.
The photo of the more modern standard casters do protrude meaning they bottom out.
The photo of the more recent 3" Caster does not protrude.
Am I saying that Shopsmith had it wrong for 70 years? No, not all of the years.
I am saying that one or more of the ‘Companies Shopsmith” had it wrong for a portion of those years, and the evidence is in the bent caster graveyards of Shopsmith owners around the world.
Since the caster industry predates Shopsmith by an additional 71 years, and they have made hundreds of millions of casters for thousands of companies and applications in the last 100 plus years, I tend to lean toward their application instructions.
You can see a typical set in BR549’s post at the bottom right which he discussed in 2016
https://www.shopsmith.com/ss_forum/view ... 45#p221945
You may disagree with me, but I think they got it wrong at some point. I think Shopsmith should have used a shorter stem, and maybe a machined adapter to fully spread the weight evenly on the yoke, which I feel was weak and would still bend on repeated swiveling when loaded on a rougher shop floor.
Everett

- 1900 Bearing Catalog to Current.png (1.1 MiB) Viewed 5293 times