I think it works great, not finished with it yet, but I use it a lot. Watch the video, and then comment or ask questions ....
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAEbiuCYwz4[/youtube]
Moderator: admin
First of all I LOVED Shipwrights version. It is in some ways a superior design as it will take thicker pieces. BUT, I didn't like the elaborate bed he had to build. Yes, it is cheaper than buying a thickness sander, and it works with the SS philosophy, but just a bit complicated. So it dawned on me (like you observe) that table height adjustment is key, I only needed to sand 2 inch and less stock, and thin stock (I am playing with some 1/16 inch veneer testing) and I knew that the planer just wouldn't do that. So I tried this. I did it at first without a dust collection hood and OMG not a good idea LOL. After I got the DC to work, it has done everything I have wanted so far.BuckeyeDennis wrote:Thanks, Dick!
My first impression was "Hey, that seems a lot simpler than shipwright's." Then I realized it's because you used the 10ER table (and height crank) for vertical adjustments, and the table-tilt adjustment for alignment to the drum. Thus completely eliminating the base/bed assembly from shipwright's design. Aside from table width, have you found any downsides to that approach? I would think that a simple flat sled would address the table-width limitation.
That table-height crank certainly does seem to make the 10ER the machine of choice for this application. (I'm quite sure that skou will agree with me on this one.) Just make a drum and a shroud, and you're in business.
In the video, you were sanding pieces that were too small for the jointer or the thickness planer. You also mentioned using it for panels that are too wide for the thickness planer. And of course, this whole thread was spawned by an end-grain board flattening question, which could be considered a special case of figured-wood finishing. Have you found any other applications where it's your go-to tool?
My theory is that the drum is "soft" with the velcro "cushion". Worst case say you stop feeding in one place and then continue on, where you stopped has a cup in it as the drum relieved it's cushion.algale wrote:I really like the simplicity of your drum sander!
Curious why you get waves if no constant feed rate. I'd think that regardless of feed rate, if you run it through enough times at the final thickness, it would eventually level out and be wave free.
I liked how you used the table not only for height adjustment but also tilted it to ensure parallelism with the drum. It would seem to guarantee alignment every time you set it up.
I also liked how you integrated the DC3300 "wand" into your dust collection hood and I thought your method for connecting the hood through the open ends of the tubes was genius.
I hope to put something like this together for my 520 at some point. Using the crank/wheel on the 510/520 carriage for rough adjustment and using the Shopsmith micro adjustable stop collar should allow for precise adjustment (as well as repeat-ability).
With all the interest in drum sanders for home workshops, you'd think there would be a run on used Shopsmiths just to adapt them into drum sanders. Cheaper by far than buying or building from scratch.
I had been thinking about using a pinch roller like you used to see on washing machines back in the day and have a canvas belt that the wood rides on so when you crank the pinch roller like I do with my mark mounted planer. But honestly, now that I have developed a little technique, I am not sure it is really necessary, and would be kinda of a rube goldberg arraignment ....thunderbirdbat wrote:Could a feed belt be made to run off the upper or lower spindle with either step down pulleys and/or gears? I can see the advantage especially if you were building your own table. I am not an engineer so have no idea if it is actually possible.
rjent wrote:I had been thinking about using a pinch roller like you used to see on washing machines back in the day and have a canvas belt that the wood rides on so when you crank the pinch roller like I do with my mark mounted planer. But honestly, now that I have developed a little technique, I am not sure it is really necessary, and would be kinda of a rube goldberg arraignment ....thunderbirdbat wrote:Could a feed belt be made to run off the upper or lower spindle with either step down pulleys and/or gears? I can see the advantage especially if you were building your own table. I am not an engineer so have no idea if it is actually possible.