Putting things in a Shopsmith Context

Create a review for a woodworking tool that you are familiar with (Shopsmith brand or Non-Shopsmith) or just post your opinion on a specific tool. Head to head comparisons welcome too.

Moderator: admin

Post Reply
User avatar
everettdavis
Platinum Member
Posts: 2163
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 11:49 am
Location: Lubbock, TX

Putting things in a Shopsmith Context

Post by everettdavis »

Some may wonder why I put this in the Woodworking Tool Review forum posts. After reading it, you will hopefully understand.

In a recent thread, new forum member drGeek wrote: “Your documentation has helped my restoration greatly, as well as let me feel like I'm in the 1950's. If only the prices were the same!”

http://www.shopsmith.com/ss_forum/viewt ... 67#p246467

That got me thinking about something I was considering writing in a different context somewhere else totally unrelated to Shopsmith. I decided to put the things I had been thinking in a Shopsmith Context first.

drGeek has a 10ER, so to make things relevant to this analysis, I had to step up to a Mark 5 era machine to compare apples to apples and stay on the Mark, or Mark V in this case.

Most any of us can see the quality, craftsmanship, enduring design engineering and value through the years in Shopsmith branded equipment whatever vintage, regardless of the company or ownership through those years who owned the rights to manufacture it at the time.

While the 10E born in late 1947 and ending in the upgraded 10ER made into 1953 were the beginnings of all things Shopsmith, 1953 saw the introduction of the Mark 5 with ‘A’ series Sand Cast headstocks, replaced in 1954 with the “B” series which are stunningly similar to those made in 2018.

1950’s it was, and in 1954 the Mark 5 sold everywhere for $269.50

Under FLSA, the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 established the minimum wage at $0.25/hr. It increased to $0.30 in 1939, $0.40 in 1945 (two years before Magna was founded in 1947)
In 1950 it went to $0.75/hr. where it remained until March 1, 1956 when it went to $1.00

So, in 1954, using the published price of $269.50 it would be interesting to compare it to the established minimum wage today in California where it was made in 1954. Today in California, the rate is $10.50/hr. or 14 times what it was in 1954. (Nationally $7.25 or 9.67 times) Washington and Massachusetts are $11.50, Oregon $10.75, and Maine, Maryland, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, are all above $10 and 40 localities have adopted minimum wages above their state minimum wage so California rate is not that far out.

For reference the 10ER was 199.50 in 1953.

If we multiply the $269.50 for a Mark 5 by 14 we get $3,773.00 for a 1954 Gilmer Based, 3/4 HP, Mark 5 with a small table, an extension table, a rip fence and accessories like the miter safety grip, upper and lower saw guards were extra or not even available yet.

Let’s contrast that to 2018. One can buy from Shopsmith direct, a Mark V 520, with Larger Work Table, the Pro Fence Table System more rigid extruded aluminum work table and extension table rails with quick locking knobs; and a heavy-duty rip fence, featuring dual fast-acting locking levers and a T-Slot in each face, allowing the use of standard Shopsmith feather boards as hold-downs, the Safety Miter Grip, upper and lower saw guards, and other standard accessories not present with the 1954 Mark 5.

555977 Shopsmith Mark V Model 520 with Pro Fence Table System is $3,829.00

$3,829.00 less the $3,773.00 for a FLSA adjusted 1954 Mark 5 without all the features the, 1 1/8 HP motor, the larger table, etc., etc., means the 520 costs $56.00 more in the context of 1954 dollars.

Yes you can still get a 510 today

555924 Shopsmith Mark V Model 510 with Standard Fence and Table System $3,559.00

$3,559.00 less the $3,773.00 for a FLSA adjusted 1954 Mark 5 without all the features the, 1 1/8 HP motor, the larger table but not Pro Fence Table System, etc., etc., means the 510 costs $214 less in the context of 1954 dollars.

Yes let’s take a peek at the Power Pro and regression price it while we are contextualizing value ….

556187 Shopsmith Mark 7 with PowerPro and Pro-Fence Table System $4,279.00

$4,279.00 / 14 to cost adjust what that unit would have cost in 1954 had anything of this technical nature been envisioned, means a 1954 Mark 7 with PowerPro headstock would have been $305.64 in 1954 dollars had it existed.

So my conclusion is, the good old days may not have been that much better fiscally compared to today in the FLSA income context.

I know that it is not a fully equitable comparison, but it speaks volumes to the quality of engineering, manufacturing, usable life and functionality of equipment designed and built some 64 years ago, that can be restored, even upgraded to today’s standards, and within the world of replacement parts and functional usage, it stands almost alone in value.

What’s more, is that some used and functioning 1954 manufactured units can be bought today in 2018 dollars for the same numerical cost they were in 1954. That is a remarkable testament to quality.

That is the Shopsmith Story, and why so many of us are engaged in preserving, restoring, using and documenting them, and their history.

And you didn’t think you could afford a new one! If they could in 1954 dollars (and they were sold in the millions) you can afford one today if it’s your passion.

Everett L. Davis - 2018
1954 Shopsmith Brochure.png
1954 Shopsmith Brochure.png (695.88 KiB) Viewed 16333 times
User avatar
algale
Platinum Member
Posts: 4828
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:13 am

Re: Putting things in a Shopsmith Context

Post by algale »

Interesting stuff. There are lots of different models out there for determining the buying power of a dollar in prior years in today's dollars.

One is the Consumer Price Index Inflation Calculator, which allows you to plug in your values and years and does the math for you.

https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl ... ar2=201801
Gale's Law: The bigger the woodworking project, the less the mistakes show in any photo taken far enough away to show the entire project!

User avatar
everettdavis
Platinum Member
Posts: 2163
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 11:49 am
Location: Lubbock, TX

Re: Putting things in a Shopsmith Context

Post by everettdavis »

The notion was not a government derivative of all products with inflation adjust to establish the value of a dollar, but using a fixed index FLSA to buy a Shopsmith similarly equipped and contrasted as a fixed set, and compare what you get in 1954 and 2018.

I realize the injection of other variables changes the matrix but two fixed values at two points in time expressed in relationship to each other. No variables. It is what it is, nothing more. An economists perspective it isn't. There is no matrix per se.

Using the BLS calculator they indicate $269.50 in January 1954 has $2,483.28 buying power in January 2018

Using Shopsmith / FLSA model, the lowest value of $7.25 federal minimum wage today or a factor of 9.67 x $269.50 it is $2606.07 or $122.79 more than BLS calculator suggesting that the $7.25 minimum wage exceeds their calculation for buying power already.

Therefore (tongue in cheek) we don't really need to raise the minimum wage from $7.25, but we know that this varies widely regionally which is why I used minimum wages in California for both calculations 1954 and 2018 against Shopsmith prices in 1954 and 2018. There are numerous states higher than $10.50, and some cities in California, any of which would make the Shopsmith / FLSA model appear even greater, especially when considering what one actually gets in a Mark V 520 opposed to a 1954 Mark 5 Greenie.

One can examine many individual 1954 vs 2018 items such as the cost of a car, or price of a gallon of gas but exacerbating the numbers across the decades are issues such as auto industry mandates in safety, fuel economy, the auto bail out. With regard to a gallon of gasoline, the motor fuels taxes that have grown per gallon, the cost of environmental compliance including 20 different blends of gasoline, each with summer and winter blends and the associated logistical refinery costs of producing, transporting and managing those blends across the nation, not mentioning the ethanol and subsidies bundled in to corn production and other bio fuel material and the ability to compare one thing to another across decades becomes near meaningless.

To the contrary, considering a Mark 5 vs Mark V 510 or 520 direct correlation of things of a kind can readily be contrasted. Clearly the Mark V 510 or 520 offers additional benefits, yet spring from the same tree so to speak.

That is solely what I was trying to illustrate..... the value through the years that are observable and comparable.

Everett
artman60
Gold Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:30 pm
Location: Pepperell Ma

Re: Putting things in a Shopsmith Context

Post by artman60 »

Good read, Thanks
The clock of life is wound but once.
masonsailor2
Platinum Member
Posts: 1564
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 11:57 am
Location: Las Vegas NV

Re: Putting things in a Shopsmith Context

Post by masonsailor2 »

Thanks Everett. That was a really good analysis of the current and past value of a SS. Very interesting.
Paul
drGeek
Silver Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:56 pm

Re: Putting things in a Shopsmith Context

Post by drGeek »

Nicely done analysis of value Everett!!!
I paid $200 for my 10er in today's dollars or about $10-$20 in 1950's money. What a great value I got...
I can't wait to tell my wife. Maybe she won't mind if I buy another one to play with.
Thanks again for your conservation efforts.
Gene Howe
Platinum Member
Posts: 3219
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:52 pm
Location: Snowflake, AZ

Re: Putting things in a Shopsmith Context

Post by Gene Howe »

Quite an interesting read, Everett. Thanks.
Post Reply