New saw arbor question
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:51 pm
Hi,
I have an extensive collection of papers from shopsmith purchases over the years. One of these deals with an arbor I purchased at a shopsmith store I believe somewhere after 1989 (paper work is dated 1989). It lists several arbors
505511
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/item ... =Find+Item
555130
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/item ... =Find+Item
555321
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/item ... =Find+Item
555608
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/item ... =Find+Item
555572
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/item ... =Find+Item
across from the 555321 is a note to the following effect:
If the lower saw guard on your MARK V is plastic you MUST use the rubber spacer (501307) that came with the Saw Arbor. Install the spacer on the quill as shown. (This mounted a 5/8" blade)
If the lower saw guard on your MARK V is metal, you MUST attach an aluminum spacer (555070) and installation instructions are available free of charge from Shopsmith.
The original arbor was a 505511 for the 1-1/4" blade but lacks the note...
Looking at the old metal guard it has restrictions on what should be mounted, it includes magna 9" and 10" blades mounted on 1-1/4 arbors, dual sided sanding disks and the dado. No mention of 5/8" saw arbor.
The metal guard came with my 1976 model, I had a collection of steel shopsmith blades for it and when the new plastic shields came out I upgraded. So far as I can remember the machine came with the rubber spacer (501307) and when I got my first arbor with the extra washer I stuck it in a box. It would appear that I must have purchased the 5/8" arbor after I upgraded to the new guard system or perhaps I wasn't using the guard back then... I know I did not make or purchase the 555070 part but I knew about it.
So at some point in time the shopsmith must not have come with the 501307 washer??? It must also be true that the 555321 arbor must have positioned the blade at a different spot then the orginal one(s) did if there was indeed an earlier 5/8" adapter.
So can anyone shed some light on this subject? For me it is just interesing as I have long since left this stuff in the sawdust of time, but we have current users who this might apply to.
Ed
I have an extensive collection of papers from shopsmith purchases over the years. One of these deals with an arbor I purchased at a shopsmith store I believe somewhere after 1989 (paper work is dated 1989). It lists several arbors
505511
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/item ... =Find+Item
555130
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/item ... =Find+Item
555321
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/item ... =Find+Item
555608
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/item ... =Find+Item
555572
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/item ... =Find+Item
across from the 555321 is a note to the following effect:
If the lower saw guard on your MARK V is plastic you MUST use the rubber spacer (501307) that came with the Saw Arbor. Install the spacer on the quill as shown. (This mounted a 5/8" blade)
If the lower saw guard on your MARK V is metal, you MUST attach an aluminum spacer (555070) and installation instructions are available free of charge from Shopsmith.
The original arbor was a 505511 for the 1-1/4" blade but lacks the note...
Looking at the old metal guard it has restrictions on what should be mounted, it includes magna 9" and 10" blades mounted on 1-1/4 arbors, dual sided sanding disks and the dado. No mention of 5/8" saw arbor.
The metal guard came with my 1976 model, I had a collection of steel shopsmith blades for it and when the new plastic shields came out I upgraded. So far as I can remember the machine came with the rubber spacer (501307) and when I got my first arbor with the extra washer I stuck it in a box. It would appear that I must have purchased the 5/8" arbor after I upgraded to the new guard system or perhaps I wasn't using the guard back then... I know I did not make or purchase the 555070 part but I knew about it.
So at some point in time the shopsmith must not have come with the 501307 washer??? It must also be true that the 555321 arbor must have positioned the blade at a different spot then the orginal one(s) did if there was indeed an earlier 5/8" adapter.
So can anyone shed some light on this subject? For me it is just interesing as I have long since left this stuff in the sawdust of time, but we have current users who this might apply to.
Ed