Dust Collection for Old SS Routing System
Moderator: admin
Dust Collection for Old SS Routing System
About 6 years ago I bought a used SS Routing System and am now finally getting around to using it. (It is no longer sold by SS.) It has an over-table arm for mounting a router, and you can mount another router under the table. I would like to know if anyone has come up with a good way to collect dust from the under table router. Apparently SS never addressed this issue by offering an accessory to enable connection of a vacuum hose to the under table router. Does anyone have a solution for this problem?
Yeah - a couple of methods of dust collection for the under-table router.gepaine wrote:About 6 years ago I bought a used SS Routing System and am now finally getting around to using it. (It is no longer sold by SS.) It has an over-table arm for mounting a router, and you can mount another router under the table. I would like to know if anyone has come up with a good way to collect dust from the under table router. Apparently SS never addressed this issue by offering an accessory to enable connection of a vacuum hose to the under table router. Does anyone have a solution for this problem?
The first, (not necessarily the best or worst) would be from Shopsmith. Dust collection is from the top.
[ATTACH]11847[/ATTACH]
The next system is home made.
[ATTACH]11848[/ATTACH]
Dust collection is from the rear of the fence.
[ATTACH]11849[/ATTACH]
- Attachments
-
- RouterTable.jpg (22.31 KiB) Viewed 2194 times
-
- New Router Fence.jpg (138.47 KiB) Viewed 2163 times
-
- Dust collector box.jpg (123.66 KiB) Viewed 2141 times
Octogenarian's have an earned right to be a curmudgeon.
Chuck in Lancaster, CA
Chuck in Lancaster, CA
Thanks for the ideas, but due to the presence of the over-arm router and associated dust collection for it, the only workable method for dust collection from the under-the-table router is a method that collects the dust from below. The following one from Rockler is the right type of design, but unfortunately is not compatible with my SS Routing System (nor can it realistically be modified to fit):
http://www.rockler.com/product.cfm?page ... wn%20under
Maybe someone has a home-made version of the Rockler dust port.
http://www.rockler.com/product.cfm?page ... wn%20under
Maybe someone has a home-made version of the Rockler dust port.
Art,
That seems like a good idea. Maybe instead of a door, I could attach the box with clips of some sort so that I could drop the entire box when I needed to access the router.
Should I be concerned that all that dust circulating in the box might block the air passages of the motor and cause it to overheat?
That seems like a good idea. Maybe instead of a door, I could attach the box with clips of some sort so that I could drop the entire box when I needed to access the router.
Should I be concerned that all that dust circulating in the box might block the air passages of the motor and cause it to overheat?
Charlese,
According to the Shopsmith owners manual, most if not all operations could be performed using the above-table router, but some operations may be easier if done using the under-table router. I have not used a router table before so I can't speak from experience; however, I have 3 routers so two can be permanently attached to the table and the 3rd can be used for freehand operations. The advantage seems to be that I can quickly switch between table-mounted routers without having to move a router from above to below the table. It would save setup time.
Even if I didn't have two routers attached, I would still need a way to collect dust when the router was mounted under the table. Maybe the above table dust port would do an OK job, but I'm sure the addition of a port mounted directly to the lower router would improve dust collection.
I tried to post a picture, but there does not seem to be a way to insert a picture into a post. The site wants me to provide a URL for the image, but I don't have one to provide.
According to the Shopsmith owners manual, most if not all operations could be performed using the above-table router, but some operations may be easier if done using the under-table router. I have not used a router table before so I can't speak from experience; however, I have 3 routers so two can be permanently attached to the table and the 3rd can be used for freehand operations. The advantage seems to be that I can quickly switch between table-mounted routers without having to move a router from above to below the table. It would save setup time.
Even if I didn't have two routers attached, I would still need a way to collect dust when the router was mounted under the table. Maybe the above table dust port would do an OK job, but I'm sure the addition of a port mounted directly to the lower router would improve dust collection.
I tried to post a picture, but there does not seem to be a way to insert a picture into a post. The site wants me to provide a URL for the image, but I don't have one to provide.
My dust collection system is crude, a dust collector hose clamped to the table when performing under table routing. If I was going to do something, I would probably incorporate dust collection into a fence. I would rotate the arm to the side so there was no interference with the overhead router and the fence. With the arm rotated you can also use the other optionsuggested by charlese.
Rob in San Diego
Email: SDSSmith51 AT gmail.com
Email: SDSSmith51 AT gmail.com
Gepaine,
I believe I have the same table system that you have, and like Chuck I have a shop built fence for under the table routing, and as Rob suggested dust collection is built into the fence. That's also the dc solution for almost all commerical table/fence systems. I will post some pictures of the fence as soon as I find out who took the camera!
Sincerely,
Ron309753
I believe I have the same table system that you have, and like Chuck I have a shop built fence for under the table routing, and as Rob suggested dust collection is built into the fence. That's also the dc solution for almost all commerical table/fence systems. I will post some pictures of the fence as soon as I find out who took the camera!
Sincerely,
Ron309753