Page 1 of 1
Planer Issues
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:35 pm
by michaeltoc
I recently refurbished a Mark V mount planer. To synchronize the table, I used a dial indicator and got all four posts to within 0.002" to the tie bars.
Since I installed new knives, I simply bottomed out the leveling screws and set the knives (per PTWFE). A test cut gave a difference of 0.004" across a 10" board. Definitely acceptable.
My problem is that I watched Nick's sawdust session about setting the planer knives using a dial indicator. In that video, the cutterhead was true to the table. In my case the cutterhead is off by 0.010", but the tie bars are true (to within 0.002"). I know 0.010" is probably nothing to worry about, but if the tie bars are true why isn't the cutterhead? Could I have missed something in rebuilding the planer?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:06 am
by JPG
michaeltoc wrote:I recently refurbished a Mark V mount planer. To synchronize the table, I used a dial indicator and got all four posts to within 0.002" to the tie bars.
Since I installed new knives, I simply bottomed out the leveling screws and set the knives (per PTWFE). A test cut gave a difference of 0.004" across a 10" board. Definitely acceptable.
My problem is that I watched Nick's sawdust session about setting the planer knives using a dial indicator. In that video, the cutterhead was true to the table. In my case the cutterhead is off by 0.010", but the tie bars are true (to within 0.002"). I know 0.010" is probably nothing to worry about, but if the tie bars are true why isn't the cutterhead? Could I have missed something in rebuilding the planer?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
How are you determining
that?
This seems on the surface as being contradictory.
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:48 am
by michaeltoc
JPG40504 wrote:How are you determining that?
This seems on the surface as being contradictory.
I used a dial indicator on the center of the cutterhead (as Nick did in the video). From one end to the other there is a difference of 0.010".
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 8:23 am
by pennview
I would think that the key dimension is from the table to the cutter head. If you look at this picture from the Shopsmith website --
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/cata ... head-1.jpg -- it shows a set-up for adjusting the cutter blades with the cutter head removed from the planer. The only way this works is if the table is perpendicular with the cutter head because the only reference point you have at this stage while adjusting the cutters is the cutter head itself. That said, if you're getting a flat board within .004" across a 10" board, I wouldn't worry too much about the cutter head alignment with the table.
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 8:37 am
by dusty
pennview wrote:I would think that the key dimension is from the table to the cutter head. If you look at this picture from the Shopsmith website --
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/catalog/images/cr_cutterhead-1.jpg -- it shows a set-up for adjusting the cutter blades with the cutter head removed from the planer. The only way this works is if the table is perpendicular with the cutter head because the only reference point you have at this stage while adjusting the cutters is the cutter head itself. That said, if you're getting a flat board within .004" across a 10" board, I wouldn't worry too much about the cutter head alignment with the table.
That jig would be simple to build and easy to use but all that it provides in the end is three cutter bars that are all the same depth across the entire bar and from bar to bar.
Exactly the same thing can be done with the cutter head in the planer. Probably takes longer but who is "on the clock" when in the shop?
BTW Isn't the "final critical dimension" the distance from the planer table surface to the cutting edge of the cutter bar with the inherent requirement that they all be "exactly" the same?
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:18 am
by michaeltoc
pennview wrote:That said, if you're getting a flat board within .004" across a 10" board, I wouldn't worry too much about the cutter head alignment with the table.
Yes - I agree, but I am a precision junkie (hazard of being an engineer). However, because it was easy to get the tie bars aligned without much fiddling, I feel that I should be able to get the cutterhead aligned to within the same tolerance.
The tie bars are attached to two identical side castings, but the cutterhead is attached to the side castings by means of two bearing support castings. I guess I need to see if I can shim/tweak the bearing supports to true up the cutterhead.
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:14 am
by pennview
Maybe table flatness is part of the issue.
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:25 pm
by JPG
Realize the setting of the table(chain sprocket syncing) is done relative to the tie bars merely as a matter of convenience for those not having a dial indicator etc.
I suggest repeating that table height adjustment, but use the dial indicator etc. and reference(vertical) to the cutter head rather than the tie bars.
I would not be surprised to find several thousands slop in the tie rod mounting location.
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:16 pm
by michaeltoc
JPG40504 wrote:Realize the setting of the table(chain sprocket syncing) is done relative to the tie bars merely as a matter of convenience for those not having a dial indicator etc.
I suggest repeating that table height adjustment, but use the dial indicator etc. and reference(vertical) to the cutter head rather than the tie bars.
I would not be surprised to find several thousands slop in the tie rod mounting location.
Great idea! I will try that.
Planer Adjustments
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 8:36 pm
by billmayo
Moving the jack shaft sprocket one (1) tooth on the synchronizing chain moves the table height .004”. I use the front right tie bar as my reference point for checking with the other three (3) measurement points (left front, right rear, left rear) with the tie bars. I move the chain at least 2 teeth at the other 3 jack shaft sprockets before starting these measurements. Using a feeler gauge with a 3” engine intake valve, I determine each of the 3 differences from the starting reference point. I note the feeler gauge differences and then move the chain for one (1) jack shaft sprocket tooth for each .004” difference at each of the 3 other measurement points.. Retension the chain and check again. I forgot if right or left rotation is needed for the sprockets at this time. Very quick to check.
I set all 3 cutter head knives with the front tie bar using the knife setting gauge that was supplied with the planer. I plane a 2” X 10“ X 2‘-3‘ board to measure to insure my adjustment is OK.
Bill