Under table radial arm saws - Sawsmith 2000 and...

Moderator: admin

Post Reply
User avatar
heathicus
Platinum Member
Posts: 2648
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:02 am
Location: WhoDat Nation

Under table radial arm saws - Sawsmith 2000 and...

Post by heathicus »

Just a bit of trivia that I found interesting. I tried to find an appropriate existing thread to add this to, but none I found seemed a great fit, so here it is in a new thread.


One of the "unique" features of Shopsmith's Sawsmith 2000 table saw was the "under the table radial arm saw" as touted in this advertisement (which I think was a horrible ad):

Image

But, this wasn't so "unique" after all. A saw by Craftsman called the "Builder's Saw" had just this feature - way back in the late 1940s. The following is from the 1951 Craftsman catalog.)

Image

Image

And here's some pictures of the real thing:

Image Image

You'll notice that where the Sawsmith 2000 had the pull handle in front and under the table, the Craftsman Builder's Saw had the handle mounted to the splitter right above the blade! Also, notice the index holes on the left side of the table for the second miter gauge. Pretty neat.

Anyway, I thought it was really cool and interesting and wanted to share.
Heath
Central Louisiana
-10ER - SN 13927, Born 1949, Acquired October 2008, Restored November, 2008
-10ER - SN 35630, Born 1950, Acquired April 2009, Restored May 2009, A34 Jigsaw
-Mark V - SN 212052, Born 1986, Acquired Sept 2009, Restored March 2010, Bandsaw
-10ER - SN 39722, Born 1950, Acquired March 2011, awaiting restoration
User avatar
BuckeyeDennis
Platinum Member
Posts: 3813
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:03 pm
Location: Central Ohio

Post by BuckeyeDennis »

Very interesting, Heath. Do you have a feel for why these types of machine didn't catch on?

For anyone in the Ohio area that is interested, here's a clean-looking Sawsmith 2000 listed for $350 on Craigslist. I don't know much about them, but believe this one has the high-end fence option and extension table(s). Pay no attention to the lawnmower in the same ad!

[ATTACH]24962[/ATTACH]
Attachments
Sawsmith.jpg
Sawsmith.jpg (17.78 KiB) Viewed 1799 times
User avatar
Ed in Tampa
Platinum Member
Posts: 5834
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 12:45 am
Location: North Tampa Bay area Florida

Post by Ed in Tampa »

BuckeyeDennis wrote:Very interesting, Heath. Do you have a feel for why these types of machine didn't catch on?
I really looked hard at the Sawsmith 2000. I wanted to buy one in so badly.
However of the two I saw both had over .005 plus and minus blade slop moment side to side.
In fact the movement was so that you could not only feel it you could actually see the blade move is you put pressure on it from the side.

The problem was the carriage was poorly constructed and just would not hold the blade in one position.

Second problem every one complains about Radial Arm being dangerous moving the blade. However on the radial arm you could see the blade on the Sawsmith the blade could be hidden moving toward you before it cut through the wood.

third problem it was priced like a Powermatic or a Unisaw and it didn't have the stuff to compete.
Ed in Tampa
Stay out of trouble!
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

Just because the blade is pulled 'like' a ras does not make it a ras. The "R" in ras refers to the pivotable arm for angle cuts. Not so with these. A chop saw could be called a radial arm saw since they also pivot(especially the newer sliding compound models(but since ras is a bad word:eek:, nobody does). :rolleyes:
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
Post Reply