Is this right? Mark V restore

Forum for Maintenance and Repair topics. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderator: admin

Brrpac
Bronze Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2022 1:47 pm

Is this right? Mark V restore

Post by Brrpac »

Hello all

Newbie here, just acquired a shopsmith Mark V circa 1980s, with original manual. Needed a new switch, no problem. Also figured I would replace the belts. After breaking down the headstock, I found this on the motor (picture, no lower motor unit sheaves) in my research, I can't find any configuration like this. Figured previous owner "rigged it". Any confirmation of my thoughts would be appreciated. Look forward to getting this bad boy working.
Thanks!
Screenshot_20220206-140121_Gallery.jpg
Screenshot_20220206-140121_Gallery.jpg (131.29 KiB) Viewed 1057 times
User avatar
rpd
Platinum Member
Posts: 3045
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:22 am
Location: Victoria, B.C.

Re: Is this right? Mark V restore

Post by rpd »

You are correct, that is not an original Shopsmith motor, it was "rigged"
Ron Dyck
==================================================================
10ER #23430, 10ER #84609, 10ER #94987,two SS A-34 jigsaws for 10ER.
1959 Mark 5 #356595 Greenie, SS Magna Jointer, SS planer, SS bandsaw, SS scroll saw (gray), DC3300,
john_001
Gold Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:28 pm
Location: Chester, NJ

Re: Is this right? Mark V restore

Post by john_001 »

With a fixed sheave on the motor, it'll only run at one speed. If you turn the speed control up, the belt will slip, and if you try to turn it slower, you could damage the speed control. You'll need the motor and sheave assembly - a pretty expensive part (almost $500) if you buy it new. They're available used if you shop around.
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Re: Is this right? Mark V restore

Post by JPG »

The "bad boy" is the person who sold that.l
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
rpd
Platinum Member
Posts: 3045
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:22 am
Location: Victoria, B.C.

Re: Is this right? Mark V restore

Post by rpd »

Some options to consider are,

buy a new motor from Shopsmith
https://www.shopsmith.com/service/heads ... iagram.htm

look for a used motor. Join the Facebook Shopsmith Sales group and post in search of.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/298235127282459/about

convert it to run a variable speed dc motor salvaged from a treadmill. There is a Facebook group for that too.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/shopsmithdigital/about

and a member here, peterm, converted one of his to run on an industrial sewing machine motor.
viewtopic.php?t=12225
Ron Dyck
==================================================================
10ER #23430, 10ER #84609, 10ER #94987,two SS A-34 jigsaws for 10ER.
1959 Mark 5 #356595 Greenie, SS Magna Jointer, SS planer, SS bandsaw, SS scroll saw (gray), DC3300,
User avatar
chapmanruss
Platinum Member
Posts: 4541
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:16 pm
Location: near Portland, Oregon

Re: Is this right? Mark V restore

Post by chapmanruss »

Brrpac,

First off Welcome to the Shopsmith Forum.

You have already been given options on what you can do. A new motor, a used motor or other substitute. Buying a used motor can be more cost effective than buying a new one and are easily found at online auctions. A used motor is a sold "as is" item. Ron already suggested the Facebook forum and there are other sources. Many used motors have come up for sale that are in very good condition and include the Pulley Sheaves too just like the new motors coming from the factory. Many are from Mark V's upgraded to the Power Pro DVR motor. That is an additional option for you as a motor replacement to go with the Power Pro DVR Motor. It is a more expensive option though and something you may not want to do yet.

Another concern I have is what was the motor belt going to. Has there been modifications to the Idler Shaft Assembly too?
Russ

Mark V completely upgraded to Mark 7
Mark V 520
All SPT's, 2 Power Stations & Crafter's Station
Model 10ER S/N R64000 first one I restored on bench w/ metal ends & retractable casters.
Has Speed Changer, 4E Jointer, Jig Saw with lamp, a complete set of original accessories & much more.
Model 10E's S/N's 1076 & 1077 oldest ones I have restored. Mark 2 S/N 85959 restored.
edma194
Platinum Member
Posts: 2205
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 4:08 pm

Re: Is this right? Mark V restore

Post by edma194 »

Good idea to send us more photos. At this point you should definitely drop the motor pan and motor and take some pictures from underneath to see what's there. Even with the motor still in you can take a picture to see what's in the area above the pulley shown above. We don't know what kind of upper pulley is there.

If not for the special configuration of a Shopsmith motor there would be even more of these decades old machines still alive and operating.
Ed from Rhode Island

510 PowerPro Double Tilt:Greenie PowerPro Drill Press:500 Sanding Shorty w/Belt&Strip Sanders
Super Sawsmith 2000:Scroll Saw w/Stand:Joint-Matic:Power Station:Power Stand:Bandsaw:Joiner:Jigsaw
1961 Goldie:1960 Sawsmith RAS:10ER
Brrpac
Bronze Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2022 1:47 pm

Re: Is this right? Mark V restore

Post by Brrpac »

Damn! I figured as much. I deeply appreciate all the feed back. I don't fault the seller as he said it was his dads,, and wasn't sure of the condition. Only paid$100 and has saw, sander, lathe, and bandsaw attachments. I've dropped the motor, and had my hands up and in the headstock. The floating sheaves and upper assembly attached to the adjustment dial is fine....had to lube a little. Well, at lease I know where I stand and what has to be done. Again, I appreciate everybody's feedback and will research all options.

BRRPAC
DLB
Platinum Member
Posts: 2307
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2019 11:24 am
Location: Joshua Texas

Re: Is this right? Mark V restore

Post by DLB »

Brrpac wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 6:06 pm Damn! I figured as much. I deeply appreciate all the feed back. I don't fault the seller as he said it was his dads,, and wasn't sure of the condition. Only paid$100 and has saw, sander, lathe, and bandsaw attachments. I've dropped the motor, and had my hands up and in the headstock. The floating sheaves and upper assembly attached to the adjustment dial is fine....had to lube a little. Well, at lease I know where I stand and what has to be done. Again, I appreciate everybody's feedback and will research all options.

BRRPAC
For $100 you are probably okay. A word of caution if you go with a used motor and sheaves, which is what I would do. Sellers are sometimes unclear about motor HP, for example will say a 3/4HP motor will work in all models or not list the HP. Not exactly false since it will fit and run, but machines built in the last 60 years or so use a 1-1/8 HP motor. That's probably what you want. Used in good condition these run about $150 - $250 plus shipping. They are frequently available on ebay, and there are several on there currently.

- David
User avatar
chapmanruss
Platinum Member
Posts: 4541
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:16 pm
Location: near Portland, Oregon

Re: Is this right? Mark V restore

Post by chapmanruss »

Unless it has problems, the Bandsaw is worth more than $100. Of course, you need something to power it.
Russ

Mark V completely upgraded to Mark 7
Mark V 520
All SPT's, 2 Power Stations & Crafter's Station
Model 10ER S/N R64000 first one I restored on bench w/ metal ends & retractable casters.
Has Speed Changer, 4E Jointer, Jig Saw with lamp, a complete set of original accessories & much more.
Model 10E's S/N's 1076 & 1077 oldest ones I have restored. Mark 2 S/N 85959 restored.
Post Reply