Hi Major,major_bob wrote:I have come to respect the knowledge and experience of this group so I ask the question:
If I had the choice of buying a 2nd SS (used) or a new table saw which would be the consensus of the forum? I am pleased with the performance of my 520 as a table saw (although wish it had a little more outfeed depth), but tire of the change over when I need to utilize it's other functions. A 2nd SS would allow me to keep my 520 in table saw mode. A dedicated table saw (considering the new Ridgid granite top) would allow me to easily use my current SS in all its other configurations.
Regrettably, there is no cut-and-dried answer to that question. I have two table saws besides the Mark V and use them all. The 12" has a large table, and I still built an outfeed table for it. I primarily use it for large panels and building lumber like 2X4's. I use the 10" primarily for repeat cuts, especially when the Mark V is set up for other operations related to the same project. Saves doing the set-up changes. I use the Mark V for fine cuts and for projects that using the same table set-ups between modes (like the saw and the disk sander) make it handy for. Having multiple saws is nice, but you must have the room for them. If you have the room, do consider a single purpose table saw.
On the other hand, there is nothing wrong with the Mark V as a table saw. It has limitations, but it was never intended to have infinite cababilities. I like what Bill Mayo pointed out about the "spare" headstock. Having two (or more) Mark V's allows you to do the things that Bill Mayo was talking about. You can build an outfeed table for the Mark V. It has already been done. On this site alone, there are at least 3 examples of such a beast.
One other thing to consider is that if your additional saw is another Mark V, you can have multiple set-ups for SPT's too, knot just table saws!