Potpourri - June 2010

paulrussell · Post by **paulrussell** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:47 pm

Yep, two things wrong. Just noticed the more obvious one! (Just like me to notice the subtle grain of the ash while while completely ignoring that the bat is bearing down on my head.)

mickyd · Post by **mickyd** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:51 pm

JPG40504 wrote:Is it my imagination, or are new 'features' appearing in this forum? Do we have a newer version of vbulletin?

No words to describe these 'figments of your imagination'?

mbcabinetmaker · Post by **mbcabinetmaker** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:05 pm

Yes. I always wonderded when they would come out with a Left hand version.

SDSSmith · Post by **SDSSmith** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:19 pm

mickyd wrote:There's something wrong here. Do you see it? Just say yes or no......
.
.
[ATTACH]9320[/ATTACH]

Is it that Waldo traded in his striped shirt for a plaid shirt?]

paulrussell · Post by **paulrussell** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:14 pm

mickyd wrote:There's something wrong here. Do you see it? Just say yes or no......

Not to mention that they weren't making the Mark V in 1956. In 1956 it was the Mark 5.

paulrussell · Post by **paulrussell** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:16 pm

SDSSmith wrote:Is it that Waldo traded in his striped shirt for a plaid shirt?]

I always assumed that was Al Borland from "Tool Time"

SDSSmith · Post by **SDSSmith** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:01 pm

paulrussell wrote:I always assumed that was Al Borland from "Tool Time"

Well Tim the Toolman Taylor would look at those pics and say Al, you need the Binsford More Power Pro! ]

mickyd · Post by **mickyd** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:41 pm

mickyd wrote:Is this patriotic enough? I like it!!! (You will too a1gutterman)
a1gutterman wrote: I got a page that says the URL is knot right. A 404 error. If you fix it, I will look at it.

Try this one...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article2028740.ece

mickyd · Post by **mickyd** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:43 pm

mickyd wrote:There's something wrong here. Do you see it? Just say yes or no......
.
.
[ATTACH]9320[/ATTACH]

So, the answer(s) are ...........?

JPG · Post by **JPG** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:55 pm

mickyd wrote:So, the answer(s) are ...........?

Mark V was non-existent in 1956 - They were Mark 5.

This page is obviously 10 years out of date.

How can it be 44 and 43 years old??? Gotta be one or the other! No fair saying 'if 44 than also 43', once 44, it is no longer 43.