Dust Collection in Table Saw Mode

Forum for Maintenance and Repair topics. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderator: admin

john_001
Gold Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:28 pm
Location: Chester, NJ

Dust Collection in Table Saw Mode

Post by john_001 »

I finally got around to hooking my dust collector to the SS table saw setup. There are two 2 1/2" ports on the lower saw guards. They don't seem to be very effective. I still get a lot of sawdust everywhere. Is this a common issue, or am I missing something? I'm using a 3/4 hp Delta two stage dust collector.
User avatar
fiatben
Platinum Member
Posts: 736
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:39 pm
Location: northwest Arkansas

search the threads

Post by fiatben »

Somewhere on here is a LONG thread regarding this very topic. Maybe one of the guys involved in that can link you to it quickly. I remember they worked on baffling under the table, etc. and made a very efficient system.
'55 Greenie #292284 (Mar-55), '89 SS 510 #020989, Mark VII #408551 (sold 10/14/12), SS Band Saw, (SS 500 #36063 (May-79) now gone to son-in-law as of 11-11), Magna bandsaw, Magna jointer 16185 (May-54), Magna belt sander SS28712 (Dec-82), Magna jigsaw SS4397 (Dec-78), SS biscuit joiner, Zyliss (knockoff) vise, 20+ hand planes, 60s Craftsman tablesaw, CarbaTec mini-lathe, and the usual pile of tools. Hermit of the Hills Woodworks, a hillbilly in the foothills of the Ozarks, scraping by.
User avatar
SDSSmith
Platinum Member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by SDSSmith »

fiatben wrote:Somewhere on here is a LONG thread regarding this very topic. Maybe one of the guys involved in that can link you to it quickly. I remember they worked on baffling under the table, etc. and made a very efficient system.
I believe that thread was Dusty's quest to reduce dust from his 520. I believe that John is working with the newer style 500 lower guard with the two ports. My recollection of that system is that it was far from perfect. I think the system on the 510/520 is an improvement but it still 'leaks'. ]
Rob in San Diego
Email: SDSSmith51 AT gmail.com
User avatar
wannabewoodworker
Platinum Member
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:36 am
Location: Milford, CT

Post by wannabewoodworker »

Speaking of dust collection does anyone have the jointer dust port on their jointer??? I don't have it and the jointer really makes quite a mess when i use it. i was thinking of ordering the dust port for my jointer but if others have it and it doesn't work very well like the saw dust collection than I will just live with the mess.
Michael Mayo
Senior IT Support Engineer
Soft Designs Inc.
albiemanmike@gmail.com
1960's SS Mark VII, 1954 Greenie, 1983 Mark V, Jointer, Bandsaw, Jigsaw, Dewalt Slider, Delta Super 10, Delta 8" Grinder, Craftsman compressor, Drill Doctor, Kreg PH Jig, Bosch Jigsaw, Craftsman Router and Table...........and adding more all the time....:D
User avatar
beeg
Platinum Member
Posts: 4791
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: St. Louis,Mo.

Post by beeg »

I have the jointer dust port and it works well. IF I let the space under the infeed table fill up with chips.
SS 500(09/1980), DC3300, jointer, bandsaw, belt sander, Strip Sander, drum sanders,molder, dado, biscuit joiner, universal lathe tool rest, Oneway talon chuck, router bits & chucks and a De Walt 735 planer,a #5,#6, block planes. ALL in a 100 square foot shop.
.
.

Bob
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21481
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

beeg wrote:I have the jointer dust port and it works well. IF I let the space under the infeed table fill up with chips.
Yes - IF I let the space under the infeed table fill up with chips - does it work better or not at all?

wannabewoodworker: I find that it works fine but you must connect the dust collector to it. Something that I often do not do.

It works less efficiently on heavier cuttings.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21481
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

fiatben wrote:Somewhere on here is a LONG thread regarding this very topic. Maybe one of the guys involved in that can link you to it quickly. I remember they worked on baffling under the table, etc. and made a very efficient system.

This was done on a 510/520 but the principle is the same.

https://forum.shopsmith.com/viewtopic.php?t=6063&highlight=collector

I suggest that you set your tablesaw up and blow all the sawdust off then rip several pieces of scrap and look for where the unwanted sawdust collects. Sit down on a bucket stool at study where it "must be coming from".

The dust collector when mated with the table has a lot of holes (leaks). I find that most of these are there to facilitate the reconfiguration process when changing modes. If you setup in the table saw mode, you can make the Mark V dust collection system near perfect. But then when you change modes, you may find that what you have done interferes with reconfiguration.

http://www.youtube.com/dustywoodworker#p/u/3/qO97xhst6wA

I am working on a dual hose system but haven't gotten far enough along to discuss details. I really miss the fabrication shop that I had access to when I was working. An ideal turned into prototype over night with those guys.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
beeg
Platinum Member
Posts: 4791
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: St. Louis,Mo.

Post by beeg »

dusty wrote:Yes - IF I let the space under the infeed table fill up with chips - does it work better or not at all?





It works much better.
SS 500(09/1980), DC3300, jointer, bandsaw, belt sander, Strip Sander, drum sanders,molder, dado, biscuit joiner, universal lathe tool rest, Oneway talon chuck, router bits & chucks and a De Walt 735 planer,a #5,#6, block planes. ALL in a 100 square foot shop.
.
.

Bob
Gene Howe
Platinum Member
Posts: 3219
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:52 pm
Location: Snowflake, AZ

Post by Gene Howe »

My 500 uses the dual port collection gadget. It's better than "nuttin", but it's far from complete. It's also a pain when changing blades and functions.
It appears that an overhead guard/collector would help. I tossed the SS guard many moons ago. :o :o
Anyhow, a well placed plastic tub from Walmart keeps most of the dust off the floor.:D
BTW, This remote is a real "turn on".:D http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=bl_sr_electronics?_encoding=UTF8&node=172282&field-brandtextbin=SuperSwitch
Gene

'The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him.' G. K. Chesterton
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21481
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

Gene Howe wrote:My 500 uses the dual port collection gadget. It's better than "nuttin", but it's far from complete. It's also a pain when changing blades and functions.
It appears that an overhead guard/collector would help. I tossed the SS guard many moons ago. :o :o
Anyhow, a well placed plastic tub from Walmart keeps most of the dust off the floor.:D
BTW, This remote is a real "turn on".:D http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=bl_sr_electronics?_encoding=UTF8&node=172282&field-brandtextbin=SuperSwitch
Gene, if you still have that guard (the one that you tossed) let me know. I am experimenting with some modifications to improve the efficiency of the Shopsmith dust collection system.

I have improved the system to the point where I can report the system collects over 95% of the dust generated when ripping. Cross cutting is another matter.

If I need to tilt the table - I also have some shortcomings yet to eliminate.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Post Reply