Page 7 of 10

Re: More On Disappointed In MiterSet

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:54 pm
by RFGuy
Clify,

You may find this previous forum thread to be useful:

viewtopic.php?p=254590#p254590

I also came across this Sawmill Creek forum thread on cutting segments. There were differing opinions on which is the more critical dimension for segments, e.g. is it the angle or the length of each segment that matters more? Apparently for the larger # of segments, like 16 or more, it sounds like the woodworkers doing this are treating it more like a machinist would, e.g. using a micrometer instead of a ruler. Even 1/64" is too much error in the length of a segment for these segmented assemblies with many sides.

https://sawmillcreek.org/showthread.php ... of-an-inch

Re: More On Disappointed In MiterSet

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:00 pm
by DLB
I'm following this thread with interest because I historically struggled getting great miters using the miter gauge. As far as I know that was 100% because of my limitations accurately and repeatedly setting the gauge, including the complementary angle for the other end to maintain edge and face references. When I wanted a great fit I always adjusted with the disc sander. Years ago I went to the Miter-Pro, also from SS, this was way before the MiterSet was offered. It works well within its limitations, meaning four-sided objects. Neither tool is great out of the box for compound angles, but both can presumably help.

It is interesting to me that SS offers two 'perfect miter' solutions, one of which aims to help accurately and repeatedly set the miter gauge angle while the other attempts to solve the exact same problem by taking the miter gauge out of the equation. Two expensive tools, aimed at the same objective, that cannot be used together... Neither is perfect, there are way too many variables in cutting the perfect miter to solve addressing only this one aspect. On paper the MiterSet is the superior solution, sets way more angles for flexibility while costing much less than the Miter-Pro. My tentative conclusion is that if the MiterSet did not make the Miter-Pro obsolete that can only be because it is not quite as reliable, accurate, or repeatable at the one thing the Miter-Pro does. I've never used a Miterset, but I'm trying to determine its utility. It seems like a great idea even for the Miter-Pro (or other miter jig) owner. I'd like to see the manufacturer make an actual accuracy statement, or add accuracy to the angle table, because it is a bit of a red flag for me. The tool only does one thing, it shouldn't be too much to ask that the supplier state how accurately it does that.

- David

Re: More On Disappointed In MiterSet

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:08 pm
by RFGuy
DLB wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:00 pm It is interesting to me that SS offers two 'perfect miter' solutions,
David,

Keep in mind that the MiterSet product is a 3rd party company, so it isn't so much that Shopsmith offers two different solutions. It is that the MiterSet competes with the Shopsmith Miter-Pro and Shopsmith happens to allow a competitor to advertise on their website. I have mostly just used my MiterSet Standard to set 90° on my Shopsmith miter gauge. For people like me that are lazy it works great for quickly and accurately setting the angle. I haven't used the other angles as much on it. I decided to go ahead and purchase both MiterSet products together for the small discount so I have the MiterSet Standard and the MiterSet Segments, but like I said already on this thread I haven't actually used my MiterSet Segments yet.

Re: More On Disappointed In MiterSet

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 10:20 pm
by BuckeyeDennis
I went down the micrometer-adjustment rathole myself not long ago. With a track saw, that is, and it worked out nicely. It’s hard to beat a 4-1/2’ long “miter bar”, for which you can eliminate all slop.

Here’s some 6” wide acid-test segments, with no post-processing. (Disclaimer: I have no affiliation with Chrysler. :D )
6BC69A96-3D0A-43A0-B300-327415BB78EE.jpeg
6BC69A96-3D0A-43A0-B300-327415BB78EE.jpeg (149.63 KiB) Viewed 1792 times

Re: More On Disappointed In MiterSet

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 10:55 pm
by Cliffy
Looks like a perfect 36 degrees!

Re: The MiterSet Debut

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2021 6:26 am
by dusty
In the beginning there was no miter set and I used an engineer's square. Then along came the MiterSet from MomandPop.

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=2662&p=28868&hilit=MiterSet#p28868

Re: More On Disappointed In MiterSet

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2021 9:06 am
by RFGuy
Dusty,

Thanks for that thread...it was an interesting read. I didn't know the origins (RAS) of the MiterSet or that it didn't always have tapered pins. Also nice to know it is a Mom and Pop kind of operation which I always enjoy supporting over the larger, more established companies. If found it really hard to believe that they got the patent approved in only 4 months! That must be a new record for patent submissions in the modern era.

Re: More On Disappointed In MiterSet

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2021 9:45 am
by dusty
RFGuy wrote: Sat Mar 13, 2021 9:06 am Dusty,

Thanks for that thread...it was an interesting read. I didn't know the origins (RAS) of the MiterSet or that it didn't always have tapered pins. Also nice to know it is a Mom and Pop kind of operation which I always enjoy supporting over the larger, more established companies. If found it really hard to believe that they got the patent approved in only 4 months! That must be a new record for patent submissions in the modern era.

It was a Mom and Pop in the beginning but I believe that has changed. I believe that what is now on the market is being produced by an outfit that purchased marketing rights from Dick Pattee and his wife.

Re: More On Disappointed In MiterSet

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2021 2:18 pm
by JPG
Actually Dick Partee died and his wife sold(I assume) the rights to the products etc.. Original version was made from a wood(BB?) base. The current manufacturer changed to the aluminum base.

Interesting post there re the short width of the SS miter gauge face. i.e. we fergit it has been raised before!

viewtopic.php?p=31375#p31375

Re: More On Disappointed In MiterSet

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:34 pm
by edflorence
DLB wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:00 pm . Years ago I went to the Miter-Pro, also from SS, this was way before the MiterSet was offered. It works well within its limitations, meaning four-sided objects.
- David
Over the years I have been enlisted by my artist wife to build picture frames for her pieces. About ten or fifteen years ago she asked me to do a run of about 30 identical frames. I knew it was going to be a really difficult task, so I decided to go for the Miter Pro. And it worked great. I am currently doing another run of 12 identical frames for her and the Miter Pro is making it an easy job. So, while I really like the Miter Pro, it can't do what the Miter Set does and I think the Miter Set is a completely different animal. Once the Miter Pro has been set up, as long as the proper sequence of cuts is followed, a right angle corner is guaranteed. The Miter Set, though, isn't a jig that will hold the workpiece during cutting. It will give you the perfect angle for whatever you want to build, but it won't hold that angle through the cut like the Miter Pro will.
Maybe what would help with cutting segments would be not just a longer fence but a longer fence that is also equipped with some vertical hold downs to clamp the segments in place. So what I am imagining is an L-shaped sled attached to the face of the miter gauge. After setting the miter gauge with the Miter Set, the workpiece would be snugged up to the fence and clamped down to the sled for the cut. Sorry no picture, but hope this is clear.
Maybe somebody who knows his way around Sketch-up might be able to draw it.